With the passage of the “Big Beautiful Bill,” Elon Musk is threatening to establish what he calls, “The American Party.” One can possibly sympathize. After all he just went through and exposed and gutted waste in the government.
Indeed, some of the founders were concerned about political parties.
In a letter Jonathan Jackson of October 2, 1780, John Adams wrote, “There is nothing I dread So much, as a Division of the Republick into two great Parties, each arranged under its Leader, and concerting Measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble Apprehension is to be dreaded as the greatest political Evil, under our Constitution.”
George Washington found the “Party System” abhorrent and said so in his farewell address to Congress. “I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.
“This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.
“The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.
“Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it. It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.”
Let’s look at what previous “Third-Parties” have wrought.
The first third-party with any showing was that of the Bull Moose party formed by Theodore Roosevelt in 1912. Roosevelt served as President from 1901 to 1909 following the death of Williams McKinley. The Rough Rider endorsed his friend, William Howard Taft, who won the election and succeeded Roosevelt. Roosevelt became disillusioned at the policies of Taft, and ran against him in the primary for the 1912 election, but the Republican Party choose Taft. Roosevelt formed the Bull Moose party to run against Taft, specifically.

Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft.
What he succeeded in doing was get Woodrow Wilson elected. Democrat Wilson believed in the bureaucracy system of England and successfully instituted that in the United States. Along with that bane, he brought us the private corporation known as the Federal Reserve.
There was the “Green Party” led by Ralph Nadar in the sixties. No real damage there.

H. Ross Perot.
You might recall the H. Ross Perot period of the 90’s. Perot, from Texas, made millions as the founder and chief executive officer of Electronic Data Systems and Perot Systems. He ran as an Independent for President of the United States in 1992. He, like Musk, was disillusioned by the taxes and where they were spent. He actually touched the American vein and was nominated in 1996 by the Reform Party formed by grassroots supporters of Perot. In a speech he referred to black people as “You people,” and the media ran with it.
In 1992 he faced off with Bill Clinton and George Bush taking over 19-million votes, but no electoral votes or winning any states. Arguably, he lifted Democrat Bill Clinton to the win. In 1996 against Bill Clinton and Bob Dole, he did much poorer and probably did not influence the outcome of the election. Bill Clinton still would have won the election.
One of the things that third-parties caused is laws that tighten the U.S. into two specific parties keeping any their-party candidate out of political debates with the full cooperation of the so-called main stream media.
So now we face another threat of the formation of a third-party. One wonders the motivation. President Trump claims that Musk is upset about the so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” because it eliminates electric vehicle mandates allowing the market to determine what they want. If this is the case, is this an American Party? Will their platform be you can buy what you want so long as it is an electric vehicle?
Does he want to promote individual freedom and individual responsibility as the founders wanted? Does he want to rip out the current tax system and put in something fairer? Do they want us to keep out of the affairs of foreign nations as the founders envisioned?
We can probably agree that—whatever the nature of the new, so-called American Party—we can probably agree that neither current party adheres to the Constitution of the United States of America. To begin to return to the Constitution we should beware of people that refer to the United States as a Democracy or Constitutional Democracy. The word democracy appears no where in the Constitution. Indeed, Article IV, Section 4 states specifically:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;…
So political parties should learn what a Republic is. And that doesn’t mean those governments that call themselves, “The People’s Republic Of…” which is another phrase meaning Communism. Actually democracy is Communism. Those “People’s Republic Of…” are actually totalitarian States. They do not select their leaders.
In simple terms, in this Republic we select people to adhere to Constitution and attend to their specific duties. The specific duties of the “Federal” government are outlined in Section 8 of the Constitution. The Congress has the ONLY authority to create laws. They cannot delegate those duties to bureaucracies, according to Gibbons V. Ogden.
The Constitution was debated and written under strict secrecy. The delegates felt that they could not have open and honest discussion if they had to explain to everyone everything they were putting into the Constitution. On September 18, 1787, they finally agreed on a document that they would submit to the States.
According to a document written by James McHenry, “A lady asked Dr. Franklin Well Doctor what have we got a republic or a monarchy – A republic replied the Doctor if you can keep it.” Then McHenry added: “The Lady here alluded to was Mrs. Powel of Philada.”
COLORADO — The non-elected judges of the Colorado Supreme Court on December 19 used an old Republican document to launch an attack on “democracy.” The State of Colorado—apparently oblivious to the Second Amendment to the Republican document—concentrated on the Fourteenth Amendment to the Republican Constitution to remove Donald Trump from the ballot in the first attack on their own vaunted “democracy.” They also completely ignored Section 5 of this amendment that states, “The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.” The power does not reside with the States.
WILLIAMS — Stupidity appears to be on the rise as punks emerge from their “safe spaces” to deface political signs in Williams. It is a crime to do so IAW Arizona Revised Statute 16-1019.
Across the Internet, the rabid anti-Trump media are touting this photo released by the “Department of Justice” of the Mar-a-Lago raid. This photo is not available on the DOJ or FBI web site. Thus it was release directly to anti-Trump outlets that would do exactly what the FBI knew they would do. None of these outlets, of course, noted the problems with this photo.
Facebook “fact checkers” are freaking out about a meme with JFK talking about needing a strong militia. They twist it around to say that it does not say JFK was against gun control. As J.D. Benfer pointed out in his comment, the quote says nothing about gun control. A strong Second Amendment stance, of course, IS implied by the quote.
Popular alternatives to GMail, Facebook, Twitter and other spyware programs.
I have been on MeWe since October last year. MeWe carries no ads and depends on the support of the people using it. You can set up one personal page and use it for free. Each additional page you want to set up costs $1.99 a month. You can also join as a Premium Member which gives you access to other features of the site, such as special emojis, online phone and other features. Even with Premium Membership, however, you still have to pay $1.99 a month for additional pages. We found this out when we started the Northern Arizona Gazette page on MeWe. We did find it worth the $1.99 a month to get news like this out there since Facebook will probably censor this on our page.
The first, and most popular, is
I have used Startpage since it was called Ixquick back in the day. It eventually morphed into Startpage with several more features. It uses the Google database to provide search results, but does not keep a record of your searches. One of the interesting newer features is anonymous viewing of web sites. If you click on the feature, it blocks cookies from the site so they do not know you are there. This feature, however, could cause difficulty accessing some of the features of the site.
The other that is growing in popularity is Duckduckgo. Like Startpage, they do not record your searches, send targeted ads or track you in privacy mode. I discovered that Duckduckgo has a privacy browser for Android phones although not available for computer. When you do a search in the phone app, you get results like any other search engine. When you click on it, it tries to make the site visitation more secure. I have not studied exactly how, but I know that YouTube videos, for example, come up with just the video you want and no popups. I have started to use it over the Firefox browser app.
Editorial by Glen Davis